Policy Evaluation of Issue Engagement with Interactive Data Visualizations in Water Security Dashboards
Keywords:
Water Security, Interactive Data Visualization, Policy Evaluation, Issue Engagement, User AnalyticsAbstract
Water security represents one of the most critical global challenges of the twenty-first century, necessitating sophisticated decision support systems to manage complex hydrological resources. Interactive data visualizations embedded within water security dashboards have become standard tools for communicating multidimensional environmental data to stakeholders, policymakers, and the general public. However, measuring the true impact of these dashboards remains problematic, as superficial interface interactions do not necessarily correlate with deep, cognitive issue engagement. This paper proposes a novel approach to predicting issue engagement by applying policy evaluation techniques derived from reinforcement learning to user interaction sequences within data visualizations. By conceptualizing user navigation through a dashboard as a sequence of state-action transitions within a Markov Decision Process, we utilize offline policy evaluation methods to estimate the expected value of specific interaction trajectories. This methodology allows for the prediction of subsequent issue engagement without relying on explicit user feedback or interruptive surveys. Through a comprehensive analysis of user interaction logs from a deployed water security dashboard, this research demonstrates that sequential policy evaluation significantly outperforms traditional aggregate statistical models in predicting meaningful engagement outcomes. The findings offer profound implications for the design of adaptive environmental dashboards that dynamically respond to user behavior to maximize comprehension and facilitate informed decision-making in water resource management.References
1. Hart, S.L.; Milstein, M.B. Creating sustainable value. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2003, 17, 56–67.
2. Wiklund, J.; Shepherd, D. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. J. Bus. Ventur. 2005, 20, 71–91.
3. Engert, S.; Rauter, R.; Baumgartner, R.J. Exploring the integration of corporate sustainability into strategic management: A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 2833–2850.
4. Langerak, F.; Hultink, E.J.; Robben, H.S.J. Market orientation and new product performance. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2004, 21, 79–94.
5. Andrew, W.S.; Weber, K. The Triple Bottom Line; Wiley: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2006.
6. Marler, J.H.; Boudreau, J.W. An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2017, 28, 3–26.
7. Tetteh, F.K.; Amoako, D.K.; Kyeremeh, A.; Atiki, G.; Degbe, F.D.; Nyame, P.E.D. Unraveling the interplay between supply chain analytics and healthcare supply chain performance: Establishing an underlying mechanism and a boundary condition. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2025, 42, 752–783.
8. Parry, E. An examination of e-HRM as a means to increase the value of the HR function. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2011, 22, 1146–1162.
9. Siddiqi, R.A.; Codini, A.P.; Ishaq, M.I.; Jamali, D.R.; Raza, A. Sustainable supply chain, dynamic capabilities, eco-innovation, and environmental performance in an emerging economy. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2025, 34, 338–350.
10. Belas, J.; Balcerzak, A.P.; Dvorsky, J.; Hotkova, A.; Bencsik, A. Corporate Social Responsibility, Business Ethics, Human Resources Management, and the Sustainability of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Gend. Approach Amfiteatru Econ. 2025, 27, 626–642.
11. Jung, J.; Kim, Y.J. Corporate foresight and firm performance in Korean SMEs. Product. Rev. 2020, 34, 3–36.
12. Kiefer, C.P.; Carrillo-Hermosilla, J.; del Río González, P. How does corporate environmental culture enable the eco-innovation transition of firms towards the circular economy? Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2024, 31, 5911–5937.
13. Al Doghan, M.A.; Soomro, F.A.; Abdelwahed, N.A.A.; Soomro, B.A. Driving circular economy progress through eco-innovations and greener enablers: A potent mechanism for environmental management and sustainability. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2025, 36, 1451–1477.
14. Mori, M.; Sassetti, S.; Cavaliere, V.; Bonti, M. A systematic literature review on artificial intelligence in recruiting and selection: A matter of ethics. Pers. Rev. 2024, 54, 854–878.
15. Lehtimäki, H.; Leppälä, K.; Mielonen, N.; Piispanen, V.; Henttonen, K.; Sengupta, S.; Parkkinen, I.; Liakh, O. Sustainable Innovation Framework: A Review of Organization, Strategic Management, and Entrepreneurship Literature. Sustain. Dev. 2025, 34, 34–64.
16. Waddock, S.A. Advancing eco-social strategic management: A whole systems lens. Sustain. Sci. 2025, 20, 2335–2354.
17. Tseng, M.L.; Lim, M.K.; Wu, K.J. Corporate sustainability performance improvement using an interrelationship hierarchical model approach. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2018, 27, 1334–1346.
18. Hart, S.L. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20, 986–1014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.