Belief Revision with Misinformation Correction Cues and Social Legitimacy across Social Media Discussions
Keywords:
Belief Revision, Misinformation, Social Legitimacy, Correction Cues, Social Media DynamicsAbstract
The widespread dissemination of misinformation across social media platforms presents a profound challenge to public discourse, democratic processes, and collective societal knowledge. While platforms and users frequently attempt to correct false claims, the efficacy of these corrections in prompting genuine belief revision remains highly variable. This paper investigates the mechanisms of belief revision by examining the intersection of misinformation correction cues and social legitimacy within online discussions. Drawing upon cognitive psychology and communication theory, the study explores how the structural characteristics of correction cues interacting with the perceived social legitimacy of the correcting agent influence a user's willingness to update their pre-existing beliefs. Through a comprehensive observational analysis of simulated social media interactions, this research systematically measures how varying levels of consensus, source credibility, and platform-mediated warnings impact cognitive flexibility. The findings demonstrate that correction cues are significantly more effective when accompanied by high social legitimacy, which serves to reduce the cognitive dissonance and defensive motivated reasoning typically triggered by contradictory information. These insights provide a critical framework for designing more effective intervention strategies on digital platforms, suggesting that socio-structural factors are just as crucial as factual accuracy in the battle against digital misinformation.References
1. van Bellen, S., & Cespedes, L. (2025). Diamond open access and open infrastructures have shaped the Canadian scholarly journal landscape since the start of the digital era. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science-Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Information et de Bibliotheconomie, 48(1), 96–111.
2. Drury, J., Carter, H., Cocking, C., Ntontis, E., Tekin Guven, S., & Amlôt, R. (2019). Facilitating collective psychosocial resilience in the public in emergencies: Twelve recommendations based on the social identity approach. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, 141.
3. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 591–615.
4. Nayak, S.; Choi, K.; Ding, W.; Dolan, S.; Gopalakrishnan, K.; Balakrishnan, H. Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning through Intelligent Information Aggregation. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2023), Honolulu, HI, USA, 23–29 July 2023; PMLR: New York, NY, USA, 2023; Volume 202, pp. 25817–25833.
5. Goel, A.; Masurkar, S.; Pathade, G.R. An Overview of Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: Threats, Opportunities, and Solutions. Sustainability 2024, 16, 11079.
6. Khaskheli, M.B.; Zhao, Y.; Lai, Z. Sustainable Maritime Governance of Digital Technologies for Marine Economic Development and for Managing Challenges in Shipping Risk: Legal Policy and Marine Environmental Management. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9526.
7. Sukhbaatar, S.; Szlam, A.; Fergus, R. Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 (NeurIPS 2016), Barcelona, Spain, 5–10 December 2016; Curran Associates, Inc.: Red Hook, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 2244–2252.
8. Foerster, J.N.; Assael, Y.M.; de Freitas, N.; Whiteson, S. Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 (NeurIPS 2016), Barcelona, Spain, 5–10 December 2016; Curran Associates, Inc.: Red Hook, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 2137–2145.
9. Jiang, J.; Lu, Z. Learning Attentional Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (NeurIPS 2018), Montréal, QC, Canada, 3–8 December 2018; Curran Associates, Inc.: Red Hook, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 7265–7275.
10. Ellis, B.; Cook, J.; Moalla, S.; Samvelyan, M.; Sun, M.; Mahajan, A.; Foerster, J.N.; Whiteson, S. SMACv2: An Improved Benchmark for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (NeurIPS 2023), New Orleans, LA, USA, 10–16 December 2023; Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc.: La Jolla, CA, USA, 2023; pp. 37567–37593.
11. Papoudakis, G.; Christianos, F.; Schäfer, L.; Albrecht, S.V. Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Tasks. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks (NeurIPS 2021), Virtual Event, 6–14 December 2021; Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc.: La Jolla, CA, USA, 2021.
12. Yu, C.; Velu, A.; Vinitsky, E.; Gao, J.; Wang, Y.; Bayen, A.M.; Wu, Y. The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Games. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks (NeurIPS 2022), New Orleans, LA, USA, 28 November–9 December 2022; Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc.: La Jolla, CA, USA, 2022.
13. Mileti, D. S., & Sorensen, J. H. (1990). Communication of emergency public warnings: A social science perspective and state-of-the-art assessment. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
14. Rodríguez-Pose, A.; Fratesi, U. Between Development and Social Policies: The Impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions. Reg. Stud. 2004, 38, 97–113.
15. Drury, J. (2018). The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 38–81.
16. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. National Land Numerical Information Download Site. Available online: https://nlftp.mlit.go.jp/ksj/index.html (accessed on 29 August 2024).
17. Kim, K.M. A study on the promotional activities and information provision by support centers for childcare: Focused on the Years 2019–2023. J. Converg. Cult. Technol. 2024, 10, 357–365.
18. Yoon, J., Andrews, J. E., & Chung, E. (2025a). Information research at 30: Its role as a diamond open access journal supporting scholarly communication in library and information science. Information Research-an International Electronic Journal, 30(2), 16–22.
19. Pellegrini, G.; Università di Roma Sapienza; DG REGIO. Measuring the Impact of Structural and Cohesion Funds Using the Regression Discontinuity Design; European Commission, Ed.; Comissão Europeia: Brussels, Belgium, 2016; Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/evaluations/2016/measuring-the-impact-of-structural-and-cohesion-funds-using-the-regression-discontinuity-design-final-technical-report-work-package-14c-of-the-ex-post-evaluation-of-the-erd (accessed on 22 December 2025).
20. Raza, M. Z., Rafiq, M., & Saroya, S. H. (2024). Status of open access scholarly journal publishing in Pakistan. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 56(2), 415–423.
21. Subaveerapandiyan, A., Seifi, L., Shimray, S. R., & Ahmad, N. (2025). Awareness and perception of diamond open access among university professors in Iran. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 58(1), 644–664.
22. World Health Organization (WHO). 2017. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/one-health (accessed on 22 November 2025).
23. World Health Organization (WHO). 2025. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/one-health#tab=tab_1 (accessed on 22 November 2025).
24. Pearce, J. M. (2022). The rise of platinum open access journals with both impact factors and zero article processing charges. Knowledge, 2(2), 209–224.
25. Geng, J.; Jiu, B.; Li, K.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, H. Joint Optimization of Frequency Selection and Transmit Power for Radar Anti-Jamming using Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Information Communication and Signal Processing (ICICSP), Zhoushan, China, 21–23 September 2024.
26. Musaddiq, A.; Olsson, T.; Ahlgren, F. Reinforcement-Learning-Based Routing and Resource Management for Internet of Things Environments: Theoretical Perspective and Challenges. Sensors 2023, 23, 8263.
27. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.
